My reply to Mitch Potter's letter (see two blog posts ago) is published at ZNet.
I sent it to him, and he replied quickly, saying:
> You take months to compose what those of us on print deadlines do
> daily and you manage only to add "lazy" to my glossary of sins?
>
> Pathetic.
>
> Enjoy your chorus of one.
>
> Mitch Potter
I replied simply:
Good to read that you got it, even if you didn't read it.
Cheers Mitch.
-J.
He replied:
Read it. Wounded by it. Have no intention of engaging further as you seem only interested in selectively distorting the spirit of my work to inflict further pain.
You are off-base in branding me racist. If you knew me you would soon come to understand how wrong you are.
Mitch Potter
I replied to that, too, saying that I had set out to wound, out of frustration at not being able to do anything to change the imbalance of the situation and its misrepresentation. I also acknowledged that I didn't think he was a racist in the sense of hating a group of people and being a bigot against them, but that he, like I, participated in a system that leads to their suppression and ongoing destruction, and that we're going along with it, not doing enough to fight it. I also worried that I may have personalized it too much, such that the wider points about the bias in the coverage and the patterns and frames for the discussion of Israel/Palestine have may have gotten lost.
I suppose that is the end of my interaction with Mitch Potter.
My article is below.